Animal Science Abstract
Using visual image analysis to describe pig growth in terms of size and shape
A. B. Doeschl-Wilson1,A, C. T. Whittemore2, P. W. Knap1,B and C. P. Schofield3
AStationed at Animal Nutrition and Health Department, Animal Biology Division, Scottish Agricultural College, Bush Estate, Penicuik EH26 0PH, UK. Correspondence to this address. E-mail: andrea.wilson@sac.ac.uk
BStationed at PIC Deutschland GmbH, Ratsteich 31, 24837 Schleswig, Germany
2School of Geosciences, SAC Building, King's Buildings, University of Edinburgh, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, UK
3BBSRC Silsoe Research Institute, Wrest Park, Silsoe, Bedford MK45 4HS, UK
Abstract
Random regression models were used to analyse the daily growth data for a total of 25 pigs of two commercial crossbred types between 75 and 140 days of age. A visual imaging system placed above a feeding station provided daily the plan area and length measurements of different body parts. Daily live-weight measurements of the pigs were obtained from a platform balance integrated into an electronic feeding station. Growth curves associated with different measures, pigs and types were compared. Significant differences in the age growth curves between the pig types could only be found in the ham width measurements (P < 0.05). The linear measure of ham width showed the greatest difference between the two types, and the lowest coefficient of variation among individual animals. Size measures were shown to be a more consistent indicator of pig performance during growth than live weight : pigs with a relatively large surface area or ham width at the early growth stage also have relatively large surface area or ham width at later stages and the between-animal variation in these measurements remains constant with age. Gain in live weight relative to increase in size differed significantly between the two pig types (P < 0.05). Pigs of the two types had significantly different shapes, but the change of shape during growth did not differ significantly between them. The allometric relationships between surface area and ham width1.85 and between body length and ham width 0.85 indicate that the ham widths of pigs increase faster in proportion to full body measures. Variations between individual animals in size increase and shape change are significant (P < 0.05). The analysis suggests that VIA size and shape measurements provide valid descriptors of pig growth.
| Search for papers on a specific subject | |
|---|---|
 |
|